I always try to look at these parties’ “solutions” through the lens of the Sustainable Development Goals. What they say is never the goal but rather the distraction, so you need to focus on the actions and results.
They repeated the word stabilise and not reduce when talking about the grocery prices. In order to stabilise the prices you need to control as much of the market as possible. So a coordinated effort by the big five grocers would be needed.
The Sustainable Development Technocracy requires fewer large companies to manage industries/sectors. This economic system is not possible if too many companies are delivering goods and services. What is a technocracy and how is connected to Sustainable Development?
Technocracy started in the 1930s at Columbia University. It was a group of people trying to find a solution to what caused the Great Depression. They developed a resources-based economic system not based on pricing mechanisms like supply and demand, but instead used an energy script to determine what should be produced, bought, sold, and consumed.
Technocracy is the science of social engineering. The scientific operation of the entire social mechanism. To produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population. This is an economic system.
How do they sell this idea to people? They brand it with the beautiful term Sustainable Development. They have nice platitudes like they will eliminate poverty, education for all, and jobs with dignity which is all wonderful stuff. When you get down to the bottom of their Sustainable Development all you have to get those things is let us have all the control of resources and management of the resources on a global basis.
Now that they have an appealing name, they need distribution. That’s where the United Nations comes in. So Agenda 21, the keystone document for Sustainable development was unveiled in 1992 at the U.N Rio conference.
Original Agenda 21 Document
That document came from the book Are Common Future written by Gro Harlem Brundtland a member of the Trilateral Commission an organization founded by David Rockefeller in 1973.
Using the U.N., they implement these policies slowly from the ground up. This tactic was outlined by another Trillerial Commision member Richard Gardnar in an essay titled The Hard Road to World Order. Here’s an important passage for it:
In short, the “house of world order” will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great “booming, buzzing confusion,” to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.
The Trilateral Commission does not play the pleb game of left vs. right politics. They have CPC representatives like Rona Ambrose, Stephanie Kusie, and Jean Charest. Liberals like Raymond Chrétien or Ian Bremmer. NDP MP Heather McPherson and Gary Doer.
All Federal parties are committed to Sustainable Development and Canada has signed on to Agenda 21/2030 and has aggressively implemented polices that move forward that agenda. They do not like to talk about it and in some cases, deny they even know what it is. We have a Federal Sustainable Development Act, they have passed bills about them, and have discussed achieving or missing targets and key metrics.
We’ll have to see what happens with the “stabilizing” food prices show. The playbook is they create pain so you beg for solutions. In this case, I think it will be solutions only a few big grocers can solve eliminating, or absorbing the smaller grocers. I will be watching this closely.